A Unified Path to CRA Compliance: Why Teams Need to Break Silos and Match Velocity

Over the past few years, cybersecurity teams have found themselves operating in increasingly complex regulatory environments. For many organizations, the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) has quickly moved from “something we should understand” to “something we need to operationalize now.”

And as I shared during our recent webinar, the challenge is bigger than simply meeting another compliance requirement. CRA exposes a fundamental truth that many organizations already struggle with:

Your real security risks live in the code. Your compliance obligations live on paper. Bridging the two is where most teams fail.

In this post, I’ll break down the core themes from the webinar:

• Why traditional approaches create delays and inefficiencies
• How reachability and context radically simplify CRA reporting
• What a unified assessment strategy looks like in practice

If you’d prefer to watch the full session, you can access the on-demand webinar anytime here.

The Digital Landscape Has Changed, But Our Processes Haven’t

Most compliance frameworks start with high-level controls. Interviews. Paperwork. Gap assessments. We’ve all been through these exercises, and they’re important, but they don’t tell the full story.

The risks regulators care about may exist up at the “policy level,” but the real vulnerabilities live deep in your codebase, your binaries, and the products you ship.

That’s where many organizations hit friction. Compliance teams view risk one way. Engineering teams view it another. Product security teams sit in the middle, trying to translate both worlds.

And the result? Siloed workstreams, duplicated effort, and massive operational drag.

The Silo Problem: Why Traditional Approaches Don’t Scale

Most organizations follow one of two approaches when preparing for CRA:

1. Controls-only assessments

This is the top-down route: interviews, paperwork reviews, scope mapping, timelines, controls, and gap analyses.

But this process rarely includes the technical depth needed to understand what’s really happening in your code.

2. Technology-only assessments

This is your bottom-up route: scanning binaries, identifying vulnerabilities, sending findings to SOC analysts, and feeding projects into release cycles.

Both approaches produce useful insights, but neither produces connectivity.

And without connectivity, the work becomes slow, sequential, and expensive. In fact, many organizations lose upwards of 300 days trying to correlate these activities manually.

A Better Way: Unified Risk Assessment

Rather than treating compliance assessments and technical assessments as separate efforts, they should be run in parallel and mapped to each other continuously.

At Finite State, we call this the Velocity-Matched Methodology:

• Technical analysis and controls assessments happen at the same time
• All data—controls, SBOM components, vulnerabilities—flows into a unified platform
• Each stakeholder sees the same truth, but through their own lens
• SOC teams monitor
• Developers remediate
• Compliance teams map findings to regulatory requirements
• Executives gain visibility into risk

This is how we collapse a 6–18 month traditional assessment into a process where day-one visibility is the norm, not the exception.

Why Reachability Is the Missing Link for CRA

CRA requires reporting only on vulnerabilities that are both present and exploitable.

That sounds simple. But the real challenge isn't identifying vulnerabilities, it’s determining which ones matter.

During the webinar, I shared a real example:

• A project with 29,447 vulnerabilities
• Spread across 5,897 components
• Filtered using reachability analysis down to 51 vulnerabilities that were actually exploitable

This is the difference between feeling overwhelmed and taking action.

Reachability transforms unmanageable lists into clear, prioritized decisions.

It also directly impacts your CRA reporting burden.

Unreachable vulnerabilities still require disposition; documentation explaining why they don’t pose a real-world threat. Automating that documentation can save hundreds of hours per release cycle.

Market Access, Not Security, Is Driving CRA Investment

One important truth teams need to hear:

Regulations like CRA aren’t just security requirements; they’re business requirements.

For many industries, like automotive, medical, consumer electronics, and industrial equipment, it’s not compliance fines that matter most.

It’s market access.

If you can’t prove compliance, you often can’t ship. You can’t recoup R&D investment. You can’t expand into new geographies.

And that’s why the way we approach CRA can’t be slow, siloed, or improvised.

How to Start Your CRA Journey: Two Practical Steps

If you're early in your CRA readiness process, here’s exactly where to begin:

1. Appoint an internal leader

Someone needs to own the cross-functional coordination between development, product security, compliance, and legal.

2. Conduct a gap analysis

This tells you:

• Which products fall under CRA
• What timelines apply
• Which teams are responsible
• Where your biggest gaps sit
• How to prioritize remediation and reporting

From there, you can build a scalable program rather than a one-off project.

Why This Matters: Moving Toward Integrated, Traceable, Auditable Workflows

To meet the demands of CRA and the dozens of other regulations your products may fall under, you need more than visibility.

You need traceability:

• Every vulnerability
• Every disposition
• Every compensating control
• Every mapped requirement
• Every person who handled each step

This is what transforms compliance from a reactive scramble into an operational capability.

And it’s why the unified, velocity-matched approach is resonating with teams that have complex product portfolios, distributed engineering models, and aggressive market timelines.

Watch the Full Webinar On-Demand

We covered far more in the live session, including a full walk-through of the reachability engine, real-world examples from large manufacturers, and a comparison of assessment timelines.

📺 Watch the full CRA webinar on-demand here

If your organization is evaluating how to scale up your CRA efforts—or you’d like a customized 1:1 CRA readiness consultation—we’re happy to help.